I do think Readicide is a problem in schools because personally
having to sit through a lecture on why the writing wanted the curtains and
walls a certain color in the room to create a feeling. The author just wanted
the color to be that color, and by the actions of the character you can guess
pretty close as to what the mood is. But if the teachers over teach the book it
makes you not want to read the classics. Sitting in my honors English class the
first trimester of school was dreadful because all the teacher did was ask what
everything means and we over analyzed EVERYTHING. The fact that I really do not
care for Romeo and Juliet anymore should say something; that is how much we
went over it. I don’t feel that genre fiction is less worthy because no matter
what we read it will in some way or another expand our mind and help us in our
everyday life. Whether that is how to kill a dragon or what to do when you are
a star crossed lover of two families that hate each other. We always take at
least one thing away from everything book we read. More times than not, I take
away almost everything you could from a book. I think that we still do need to
teach the literary fiction because those are the classics, and you make references
to them in everyday life without even noticing it almost. Song writers put them
into their songs, take Taylor Swift for example. In her song Love Story she made the whole song around Romeo and Juliet, anybody
can see that, as she said the names, but if we stop teaching the books, then
nobody will know the true meaning behind the reference in the song, it will
just be weird lyrics that “make sense”. I think that we should add more genre
fiction into the curriculum, but not too much that it over powers the classics,
there needs to be a fine balance between the two. I don’t think that we should
swap the classics with modern day popular books, even if some day they might
have a chance of becoming the classic. I think that preserving what has been
taught for so long is good, but the teachers are suffocating the fun in what
the book really means. They have a set
plan and tests for the book, but you might think something entirely different
of the book, but the teachers won’t care because that is what they are supposed
to teach you, so what does it matter to them if you think differently? Most teachers,
in my experience, only think what they have to teach is correct. I remember
wanting to tell my teacher something about Romeo and Juliet and when I finally did,
she laughed it off because it was not in the curriculum. I think that we should
be able to read with a certain variety, that does not suffocate us with the
ideas of others and then we be able to take what we want from the book and
apply it to our own lives. That being said I think that a modern day book list
should consist of different amounts of classics and present day popular books. As
I said before, we can take things away from books, anything that we want, but
then change it to apply to modern day life. So if we do keep literary fiction,
and I think we should, students can apply whatever we want to their own lives,
without the ideas, that may not be wrong, to modern day life. Kids need to read books so
that they don’t have to stare at a TV screen for two hours to know that Marley
dies at the end. Kids should read the books to find that out. The books allow
you to create your own version of everything. And people may differ you’re
idea, but it’s yours and only yours. There is no one that can take the idea
away from you no matter how hard they might try. The fact of the matter is that
books allow us you reach into our mind and see the vivid details that the
author writes. The movies give you a representation of what others think, they
put that view into your mind and then you will never truly know what you think
everything looks like. I think we need to read books to let our mind run free
with imagination.
I agree with you about the over analizing, or analizing EVERYTHING, becuase we do and thats all we do for those books is think about the deeper meaning, when what if there isnt supposed to be a deeper meaning.
ReplyDelete